Token VS Equity: The Aave Controversy
On December 17, Aave founder and CEO Stani.eth posted on social media that after four years, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission had completed its investigation into the Aave protocol.
This was supposed to be an inspiring milestone. However, as Web2 finished its entanglement with the SEC, Aave found itself facing a "backyard fire" in Web3 instead. Over the past half month, Aave's community governance dispute has been a hot topic in the English-speaking community. Around this dispute, there have been a series of events including whale sells, founder "buybacks," governance, and trust issues.
Let's take a look at the background of this event.
Cause: Revenue Distribution Sparks Controversy
On December 4, Aave Labs switched the default Swap feature on its front-end interface aave.com from ParaSwap to CoWSwap.
What was originally just a minor update, Aave DAO's senior governance participant and independent delegate EzR3aL discovered that the fee revenue generated by aave.com's default Swap feature was no longer flowing into the Aave DAO treasury as before but rather into an address controlled by Aave Labs. Based on on-chain investigation, EzR3aL stated that at the time of his post, the recent income transfer by Aave Labs was worth at least $200,000, with a rough estimate of at least $10 million in annual loss for Aave DAO based on the weekly revenue data.
However, Aave Labs did not proactively mention the change in fee revenue distribution, leaving many $AAVE holders feeling "betrayed."
Aave Labs responded multiple times to EzR3aL's post, with the main arguments being:
The protocol and the product are different concepts. The frontend interface that sparked the revenue distribution dispute is a product operated by Aave Labs, completely separate from the protocol managed by Aave DAO, and Aave Labs have the right to decide how to operate and profit.
Maintaining the frontend interface requires significant resources, and Aave DAO was never required to bear these costs.
In the original Paraswap-integrated technical architecture, the donation mechanism was based on surplus. When the actual execution price was higher than the quoted price, the surplus would be donated to Aave DAO. This was not a protocol fee, nor was it a mandatory requirement to give to Aave DAO. With the design changes, the original donation mechanism was naturally discontinued.
The new CoWSwap routing option can improve execution quality, including providing MEV protection for interface users, and this routing option was concocted by Aave Labs with its own resources, and it does not replace or disable the adapters owned by the Aave DAO at the protocol level, allowing the Aave DAO to let any interface integrate its owned adapters to enable swap functionality.
Contention Upgrade: Who Owns "Aave"?
Aave Labs' response to EzR3aL's post has not been understood and accepted by the community.
On December 13, @DefiIgnas published a lengthy article titled "Who Owns Aave: Aave Labs or Aave DAO?," which sparked widespread discussion.
On December 16, former Aave Labs CTO Ernesto released a governance proposal titled "$AAVE Alignment Phase 1: Ownership," advocating for Aave DAO and Aave token holders to explicitly control core rights such as protocol IP, brand, equity, and revenue. Aave service providers representative Marc Zeller and others publicly endorsed the proposal, calling it "one of the most influential proposals in Aave's governance history."
In the proposal, Ernesto mentioned, "Due to some events in the past, some previous posts and comments have shown strong animosity towards Aave Labs. However, this proposal aims to remain neutral. The proposal does not imply that Aave Labs should not contribute to the DAO or lacks the legitimacy or ability to contribute, but the decision should be made by Aave DAO."
On December 18, Aave founder and CEO Stani.eth replied to the proposal, stating that they would strengthen communication between Aave Labs and the community but would vote against the proposal because it simplifies a complex legal and operational issue into a simple "yes or no" vote without a practical solution, affecting Aave's overall development progress.
This further escalated the dispute.
Whale Sell-off, Founder's Market "Rescue"
On December 22, according to on-chain analyst yujianguo's monitoring, the whale address holding the second-largest amount of AAVE sold off 230,000 AAVE tokens (approximately $38 million), causing a short-term price drop of over 10%. The whale exchanged all AAVE for 227.8 WBTC and 5869.4 stETH between 5:40 and 7:05 a.m., reportedly acquiring these AAVE from late last year to early this year at an average cost of about $223.4. This selloff at an average price of around $165 is estimated to incur a loss of $13.45 million.
Shortly after the Whale's exit, Aave Labs announced that the issue needed formal governance decision-making and officially initiated a 3-day snapshot vote.
On December 23, Aave founder and CEO Stani.eth spent 1699 ETH (5.15 million USD) to buy 32,660 AAVE tokens at an average price of 157.78 USD. Including this purchase, he bought a total of 84,033 AAVE tokens within a week at an average price of around 176 USD, spending approximately 14.8 million USD.
However, despite the founder's "market rescue," the price turmoil continued. On December 24, the address starting with "0x3c7," known for "Large AAVE Short," opened a 7x leveraged AAVE short position with a 2.42 million USD position size at an average price of 151 USD and a liquidation price of 173 USD.
There were many doubts and concerns in the market regarding the founder's "market rescue" as well. DeFi strategist and liquidity expert Robert Mullins stated in a post that the purpose of this purchase was to increase Kulechov's voting power to support a proposal in an upcoming vote that directly harms the best interests of the token holders. He added: "This is a clear example that the token mechanism has not been adequately designed to effectively deter governance attacks."
Renowned crypto KOL Sisyphus also expressed similar concerns, suggesting that Kulechov may have sold millions of dollars worth of AAVE tokens between 2021 and 2025 and questioned the economic motives behind this buyback.
Outcome
On December 26, Wintermute's founder and CEO Evgeny Gaevoy stated that Wintermute would vote against the ARFC governance proposal to transfer the "brand asset control of AAVE to the holders."
Evgeny mentioned that the current proposal lacks specific details, and it is not clear how the entity owning the front end and brand would govern, whether it is for-profit, and how it operates. Token value capture is a core issue facing AAVE, and there is a clear mismatch in expectations between Aave Labs and a large number of token holders. Wintermute has been investing in AAVE since 2022 and has participated in its governance. Evgeny hopes that Aave Labs will address the issue of token value capture seriously, which will serve as a reference for other tokens.
The voting results were also released this morning, with the proposal ultimately not passing, resulting in 55.29% against, 41.21% abstaining, and only 3.5% in favor.

So, is this the end of the dispute? Apparently not, as the lack of trust between the community and Aave Labs remains unresolved. What seemed to be a conflict triggered by poor communication is actually a manifestation of the long-standing contradiction in the crypto world between development/operation teams and governance, where rights and interests are unclear and lack institutional constraints. The entanglement between Aave Labs and Aave DAO actually underscores Aave's success, as there are too many similar examples in the crypto world where such high-quality discussions do not even have the opportunity to occur in an attempt to resolve issues (related reading: Why are projects in the crypto space not asking for tokens in acquisitions?).
This is the problem Aave must face, and it is a problem that the entire cryptocurrency industry will sooner or later have to confront.
You may also like

Tom Lee's Ethereum Thesis: Why the Man Who Called the Last Cycle Is Doubling Down on Bitmine
Tom Lee is emerging as one of Ethereum’s most influential supporters. From Fundstrat to Bitmine, his Ethereum thesis combines staking yield, treasury accumulation, and long-term network value. Here is why “Tom Lee Ethereum” has become one of crypto’s most watched narratives.

Naval personally takes the stage: The historic collision between ordinary people and venture capital

a16z Crypto: 9 Charts to Understand the Evolution Trends of Stablecoins

Refutation of Yang Haipo's "The End of Cryptocurrency"

Can a hairdryer earn $34,000? Interpreting the reflexivity paradox of prediction markets

6MV Founder: In 2026, the "landmark turning point" for crypto investment has arrived

Abraxas Capital Mints $2.89 Billion USDT: Liquidity Boost or Just More Stablecoin Arbitrage?
Abraxas Capital just received $2.89 billion in freshly minted USDT from Tether. Is this a bullish liquidity injection for crypto markets, or is it business as usual for a stablecoin arbitrage giant? We analyze the data and the likely impact on Bitcoin, altcoins, and DeFi.

A VC from the Crypto world said AI is too crazy, and they are very conservative

The Evolutionary History of Contract Algorithms: A Decade of Perpetual Contracts, the Curtain Has Yet to Fall

Kicked out by PayPal, Musk aims to make a comeback in the cryptocurrency market

Solana ETF News: What Is a Solana ETF and Why Is Goldman Sachs Betting $108 Million on SOL?
Solana ETF news today shows Goldman Sachs disclosed a $108M position while total SOL ETF inflows reached $1.45B. Analysts now expect up to $6B in institutional demand as Solana trades 71% below its all-time high.

Bitcoin ETF News Today: $2.1B Inflows Signal Strong Institutional Demand for BTC
Bitcoin ETFs news recorded $2.1B inflows over 8 consecutive days, marking one of the strongest recent accumulation streaks. Here’s what the latest Bitcoin ETF news means for BTC price and whether the $80K breakout level is next.

Michael Saylor: Winter is Over – Is He Right? 5 Key Data Points (2026)
Michael Saylor tweeted yesterday “Winter‘s Over.” It is short. It is bold. And it has the crypto world talking.
But is he right? Or is this just another CEO pumping his bags?
Let us look at the data. Let us be neutral. Let us see if the ice has really melted.

WEEX Bubbles App Now Live Visualizes the Crypto Market at a Glance
WEEX Bubbles is a standalone app designed to help users quickly understand complex crypto market movements through an intuitive bubble visualization.

Polygon co-founder Sandeep: Writing after the chain bridge chain explosion

Major Upgrade on Web: 10+ Advanced Chart Styles for Deeper Market Insights
To deliver more powerful and professional analysis tools, WEEX has rolled out a major upgrade to its web trading charts—now supporting up to 14 advanced chart styles.

Morning Report | Aethir secures a $260 million enterprise contract with Axe Compute; New Fire Technology acquires Avenir Group's trading team; Polymarket's trading volume surpassed by Kalshi

Why a Million-Follower Crypto KOL Chooses WEEX VIP?
Discover why top crypto KOL Carl Moon partnered with WEEX. Explore the WEEX VIP ecosystem, 1,000 BTC protection fund, and exclusive rewards for serious traders.
Tom Lee's Ethereum Thesis: Why the Man Who Called the Last Cycle Is Doubling Down on Bitmine
Tom Lee is emerging as one of Ethereum’s most influential supporters. From Fundstrat to Bitmine, his Ethereum thesis combines staking yield, treasury accumulation, and long-term network value. Here is why “Tom Lee Ethereum” has become one of crypto’s most watched narratives.
