One Balance to Rule Them All: Gravitas' On-Chain Prime Broker Ambition
Forty years ago, the world of financial transactions was forever changed by a technological revolution.
Back then, transactions still relied on physical spaces. But soon, computer terminals began to replace the yelling on the trading floor. In 1981, a trader named Michael Bloomberg was fired from Salomon Brothers, and with a $10 million severance package, he founded a company aimed at making financial data transparent and real-time. He succeeded.
The Bloomberg Terminal allowed traders to sit in their offices for the first time, seeing real-time streaming market quotes. Finance, once a privilege of the few, transformed into a standardized flow of information.
By the 1990s, the widespread use of the internet brought this revolution to its peak, dramatically lowering the cost of serving customers. Companies like E*Trade and Charles Schwab allowed ordinary people to place stock orders from their homes for the first time, reducing trading commissions from tens of dollars per trade to single digits. The barrier to entry in finance was drastically lowered.
Fast forward forty years, the once tech pioneer has also become a massive traditional force. And a new disruptor is transitioning from the crypto world to the traditional world. This time, it aims to change something more fundamental than the transactions themselves—capital efficiency.
The Trilemma of a Trillion-Dollar Casino
By 2025, global cryptocurrency derivatives trading volume reached $85.7 trillion. The Perp DEX market alone generated $7.9 trillion in trading. 15% of the total revenue generated in the entire cryptocurrency market in a year comes from this fast-spinning roulette wheel. Perpetual contracts are one of the most profitable businesses in this industry.
Grvt emerged in this casino. Launched in January 2025, in just a few months, the total trading volume reached $177 billion, steadily ranking between fifth and tenth globally in Perp DEX trading volume. Monthly trading volume growth rates once reached 352%, while open interest growth rates surged to 1601%.
At the capital table, it has secured $34 million investments from top institutions like Hack VC, Delphi Ventures, Further Ventures, ZKSync, and EigenLayer.
However, the casino itself is facing a crisis.
As the saying goes, the house always wins. On-chain data shows that on Hyperliquid, as high as 86% of traders are at a loss. A few winners eat up the majority of people's capital; this is not a sustainable situation.
A product that consistently causes the vast majority of users to lose money will inevitably face ongoing user attrition. Casinos need new narratives, beyond speculation, there must be a real value anchor.
So, everyone's attention turned to the tokenization of real-world assets. By moving assets such as US Treasury bonds, stocks, and commodities—things that everyone understands and can touch—onto the blockchain, they become 24/7 tradable digital tokens. Wall Street giants like BlackRock and Franklin Templeton have also joined the race. By the end of 2025, the total size of on-chain RWAs had already exceeded $35 billion. According to Boston Consulting Group's forecast, this number will reach $160 trillion by 2030.
This migration has also changed the rules of the perpetual contract game.
In October 2025, Hyperliquid introduced the HIP-3 standard, allowing anyone to deploy perpetual contract markets for any asset on its platform. Assets like gold, oil, stocks, and even geopolitical indices could theoretically become tradable instruments.
In February 2026, Ondo Finance announced the launch of Ondo Perps, enabling global non-US users to directly trade perpetual contracts of stocks like Apple, Nvidia, and Tesla. Kraken also announced in the same month the launch of the world's first regulated tokenized stock perpetual contract.
This is a major trend, with perpetual contracts evolving from a "crypto casino" into a true global asset allocation tool.
But there is a contradiction here that almost everyone is avoiding.
Existing perpetual contract platforms have a fatal capital efficiency flaw: they only accept stablecoins as collateral. This means that if you hold tokenized Apple stock and want to hedge risk or leverage your position, you still need to prepare another sum of stablecoins as collateral.
So, who will provide the underlying account system that can link all assets together?
From Goldman Sachs to On-Chain: The Answer of a Group of "Rebels"
Grvt's founder and CEO, Hong Yea, is one of those who defected from the old world.
Prior to founding Grvt, he spent over a decade as an executive director at Goldman Sachs and also worked as a trader at Credit Suisse. Someone with this background can see through the intricacies of traditional finance. Around him are also a group of similarly backgrounded rebels: CTO Aaron Ong, from Meta, who was responsible for the architecture design of a data privacy framework; COO Matthew Quek, coming from DBS Bank in Singapore and the government's tech sector, with deep experience in blockchain and payment systems.
This group of people coming together is not to create another Binance or Coinbase. What they want to do is bring something that has been in Wall Street for decades to the crypto space. This thing is called the "Prime Broker".
The Prime Broker is the general logistics department for hedge funds. Top-tier investment banks like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley provide a full range of services to large clients such as Bridgewater and Renaissance Technologies, including trade execution, financing, securities clearing, risk management, etc. Hedge funds only need one account to go long, short, leverage in the global market seamlessly. Every cent of their money operates efficiently.
Yet today's crypto world is extremely fragmented. Your Bitcoin is on Exchange A, Ethereum is in Wallet B, stablecoins are in Protocol C for yield farming. You want to use Bitcoin as collateral to trade Ethereum perpetual contracts while also not missing out on stablecoin yield. Sorry, not possible. You have to hop back and forth between three platforms, and each switch is a capital loss, eating away at fees, time costs, and intangible profits.
Grvt calls this loss "Capital Drag". This is precisely the core pain point they aim to solve.
To put it more bluntly, Charles Schwab used the Internet to break down Wall Street's information barrier, allowing ordinary people to buy stocks for the first time; Robinhood eliminated trading thresholds with zero commission, allowing retail investors to trade options. And Grvt aims to be the new generation brokerage in the on-chain world, replicating Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley's Prime Broker business on-chain, moving that capital efficiency tool that only top hedge funds could enjoy to the chain, open to everyone. This is something that has never truly been achieved by anyone.
Their solution, condensed into one word, is "On-Chain Prime Broker". And the core weapon to achieve this goal is called "Unified Margin".
It is a concept that sounds simple but is extremely complex to implement. It means that all your assets in Grvt, whether it's Bitcoin, stablecoins, or future tokenized US Treasuries and stocks, exist in a unified balance. The money in this balance can do several things at once, serve as trading margin, open both long and short perpetual contracts; through integration with DeFi lending protocols, automatically generate up to an 11% annualized return; at the same time, if your collateral Bitcoin appreciates, you can still benefit from the price increase.
Your money has finally learned 'Multiplicity'.
Grvt aims to consolidate the originally fragmented actions of trading, asset management, and investment into one account, one balance, and one interface. However, here lies a challenge because Grvt is not just aiming to build a better exchange; its ambition is to create a full-stack financial platform for institutional-grade users. This means it needs to satisfy institutional-level risk control and audit rigor, as well as a seamless user experience, which seems somewhat contradictory.
The solution proposed by Grvt is to embed "institutional-grade" into the product's underlying architecture rather than as a standalone barrier. Its risk management system operates on a dual-track basis: there is a real-time risk engine off-chain and an on-chain smart contract automatic clearing mechanism. The flagship strategy provided by its strategy marketplace boasts an impressive Sharpe ratio of up to 11.97, a figure that even most traditional hedge funds find hard to achieve.
Now, this all sounds very promising, but is it truly feasible from a technological standpoint? How does it address the trust issue that looms over all centralized exchanges?
Making Trust Computable
Grvt's answer is a hybrid mode combined with zero-knowledge proofs. You can think of it as a bank that operates at lightning speed in the frontend and is absolutely secure in the backend. Your trade orders are matched on Grvt's proprietary off-chain servers. Here, there is no blockchain congestion or high Gas fees; the speed can reach sub-millisecond levels, similar to placing an order on the NYSE. This is the experience of a CEX.
However, all processes involving asset transfers and settlement must revert to on-chain, completed within a zero-knowledge proof system called Validium. This functions as a safe based on ZKsync technology. Through zero-knowledge proofs, Grvt will mathematically prove to the world that every settlement is accurate and secure without revealing any transaction details. Your funds always remain in your own wallet, untouchable by anyone else.
This combination of institutional-grade compliance and on-chain self-custody is extremely rare in the entire Perp DEX space. Most DEXs either take a purely on-chain approach, forsaking compliance, or follow the CEX route, sacrificing self-custody. Grvt has chosen a more challenging yet broader path.
On the compliance front, it holds itself to regulatory-grade standards, undergoes regular professional audits, ensures the platform achieves the same level of transparency and security as regulated entities, and actively keeps up with compliance developments in major global jurisdictions to be well-prepared for the future.
Flywheel Launch: Aave Partnership and 2026 Roadmap
By the end of February 2026, Grvt announced a partnership with Aave. As the largest lending protocol in the DeFi world, Aave has a net deposit size exceeding $400 billion, capturing about 60% of the DeFi lending market share. The core of this collaboration is to embed Aave's lending yield directly into Grvt users' trading collateral. The stablecoin you hold in Grvt will automatically be routed to Aave while waiting for trading opportunities, earning up to an 11% annualized yield. When you need to open a position, this money will be immediately withdrawn from Aave and become your collateral. The entire process is completely transparent to the user, requiring no manual operation.

In this partnership announcement, Aave's founder Stani Kulechov stated, "Stablecoins that do not earn yield represent an opportunity cost for traders." This collaboration aims to reduce this opportunity cost to zero.
This is the first key gear of Grvt's 2026 roadmap. The roadmap is divided into four layers, resembling a compounding flywheel:
The first layer is Earn. At its core is unified collateral and prime broker borrowing, where Grvt has built a bridge connecting liquidity providers and traders. The platform allows traders to use 20% of their own funds to leverage 80% of platform borrowing. Simultaneously, the system sets the trader's own funds as a safety cushion so that in case of a loss, the trader's own money is lost first. This mechanism allows Earn and Trade to form a positive feedback loop, where more traders create more borrowing demand, bringing higher returns to depositors.
The second layer is Trade. Grvt will expand the underlying assets of perpetual contracts from cryptocurrencies to global stocks, forex, and commodities. Additionally, it will launch a spot market, initially provided by professional market makers for deep liquidity, and later transition to a community-driven listing mechanism where anyone can stake funds to propose new trading pairs, with the community voting on whether to list them.
The third layer is Invest. Grvt will expand its strats market, allowing institutional fund managers, professional traders, and even AI algorithms to become financial advisors on the platform. Users can entrust their funds to these strategies and enjoy the returns.
The fourth layer is Pay. Bridging P2P payments and fiat on/off-ramps, allowing users to use their crypto assets as conveniently as money in a regular bank account.
These four layers form an interconnected system. Grvt describes this logic by saying that unified collateral makes lending more efficient, lending makes deposits more productive, more productive deposits attract more capital, more capital deepens liquidity, deeper liquidity improves execution quality, better execution attracts more traders, more traders create more borrowing demand.
On March 12, 2026, Grvt disclosed the key details of the tokenomics, including the allocation, use cases, and distribution mechanism of the $GRVT token. Holders of $GRVT will benefit from lower fees in perpetual contracts, spot markets, and the payment layer, receive higher DeFi rewards, as well as platform revenue sharing and priority access to new markets.
The End
Forty years ago, a technological revolution shattered the island of information and reshaped Wall Street. Forty years later, Grvt aims to break the island of capital using an on-chain prime brokerage model.
Starting from the highest frequency and most brutal battleground of perpetual contracts, solving the efficiency problem of capital with cross-margin, then addressing trust issues with zero-knowledge proofs and self-custody, and finally expanding into stocks, forex, and commodities, these broader real-world assets.
This is no longer a story about speculation but a narrative about assets. The future of finance does not belong to those building more islands but to those who can connect all islands into a single continent as bridgers.
You may also like

From x402 to MPP: Cloudflare's crucial vote, will it go to Coinbase or Stripe?

BlackRock CEO issues annual open letter: The wave of tokenization has arrived, and we will lead this trend

When Backpack backstabs the community

When gold is no longer a safe haven, and Bitcoin continues to panic

Trump, the World's Largest Oil Trader

If the US and Iran have not reached an agreement in 5 days, what other cards does Trump have?

Tether Whale Dumps £12 Million, Backing Crypto’s ‘British Trump’

Ethereum Foundation Post: Rethinking the Division of Work Between L1 and L2 to Build the Ultimate Ethereum Ecosystem

Two Major Prediction Market Platforms Unite Rarely, What Is the Story Behind This New Fund?

Dragonfly Partners: Most agents will not engage in autonomous trading, how can crypto payments prevail?

US AI Startup Goes All In on Chinese Mega-Model | Rewire News Morning Brief

Trump Lies Again: A "Five-Day Pause" Psyop, How Wall Street, Bitcoin, and Polymarket Insiders Synced Uposciogen

When a Token Becomes Labor, People Become the Interface

Ceasefire News Leaked Ahead of Time? Large Polymarket Bets on Outcome Before Trump's Tweet

BlackRock CEO's Annual Shareholder Letter: How is Wall Street Using AI to Keep Profiting from National Pension Funds?

Sun Valley Releases 2025 Financial Report: Bitcoin Mining Revenue Reaches $670 Million, Accelerating Transformation to AI Infrastructure Platform
On March 16, 2026, in Dallas, Texas, USA, CanGu Company (New York Stock Exchange code: CANG, hereinafter referred to as "CanGu" or the "Company") today announced its unaudited financial performance for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2025. As a btc-42">bitcoin mining enterprise relying on a globally operated layout and dedicated to building an integrated energy and AI computing power platform, CanGu is actively advancing its business transformation and infrastructure development.
• Financial Performance:
Total revenue for the full year 2025 was $688.1 million, with $179.5 million in the fourth quarter.
Bitcoin mining business revenue for the full year was $675.5 million, with $172.4 million in the fourth quarter.
Full-year adjusted EBITDA was $24.5 million, while the fourth quarter was -$156.3 million.
• Mining Operations and Costs:
A total of 6,594.6 bitcoins were mined throughout the year, averaging 18.07 bitcoins per day; of which 1,718.3 bitcoins were mined in the fourth quarter, averaging 18.68 bitcoins per day.
The average mining cost for the full year (excluding miner depreciation) was $79,707 per bitcoin, and for the fourth quarter, it was $84,552;
The all-in sustaining costs were $97,272 and $106,251 per bitcoin, respectively.
As of the end of December 2025, the company has cumulatively produced 7,528.4 bitcoins since entering the bitcoin mining business.
• Strategic Progress:
The company has completed the termination of the American Depositary Receipt (ADR) program and transitioned to a direct listing on the NYSE to enhance information transparency and align with its strategic direction, with a long-term goal of expanding its investor base.
CEO Paul Yu stated: "2025 marked the company's first full year as a bitcoin mining enterprise, characterized by rapid execution and structural reshaping. We completed a comprehensive adjustment of our asset system and established a globally distributed mining network. Additionally, the company introduced a new management team, further strengthening our capabilities and competitive advantage in the digital asset and energy infrastructure space. The completion of the NYSE direct listing and USD pricing also signifies our transformation into a global AI infrastructure company."
"As we enter 2026, the company will continue to optimize its balance sheet structure and enhance operational efficiency and cost resilience through adjustments to the miner portfolio. At the same time, we are advancing our strategic transformation into an AI infrastructure provider. Leveraging EcoHash, we will utilize our capabilities in scalable computing power and energy networks to provide cost-effective AI inference solutions. The relevant site transformations and product development are progressing simultaneously, and the company is well-positioned to sustain its execution in the new phase."
The company's Chief Financial Officer, Michael Zhang, stated: "By 2025, the company is expected to achieve significant revenue growth through its scaled mining operations. Despite recording a net loss of $452.8 million from ongoing operations, mainly due to one-time transformation costs and market-driven fair value adjustments, the company, from a financial perspective, will reduce its leverage, optimize its Bitcoin reserve strategy and liquidity management, introduce new capital to strengthen its financial position, and seize investment opportunities in high-potential areas such as AI infrastructure while navigating market volatility."
The total revenue for the fourth quarter was $1.795 billion. Of this, the Bitcoin mining business contributed $1.724 billion in revenue, generating 1,718.3 Bitcoins during the quarter. Revenue from the international automobile trading business was $4.8 million.
The total operating costs and expenses for the fourth quarter amounted to $4.56 billion, primarily attributed to expenses related to the Bitcoin mining business, as well as impairment of mining machines and fair value losses on Bitcoin collateral receivables.
This includes:
· Cost of Revenue (excluding depreciation): $1.553 billion
· Cost of Revenue (depreciation): $38.1 million
· Operating Expenses: $9.9 million (including related-party expenses of $1.1 million)
· Mining Machine Impairment Loss: $81.4 million
· Fair Value Loss on Bitcoin Collateral Receivables: $171.4 million
The operating loss for the fourth quarter was $276.6 million, a significant increase from a loss of $0.7 million in the same period of 2024, primarily due to the downward trend in Bitcoin prices.
The net loss from ongoing operations was $285 million, compared to a net profit of $2.4 million in the same period last year.
The adjusted EBITDA was -$156.3 million, compared to $2.4 million in the same period last year.
The total revenue for the full year was $6.881 billion. Of this, the revenue from the Bitcoin mining business was $6.755 billion, with a total output of 6,594.6 Bitcoins for the year. Revenue from the international automobile trading business was $9.8 million.
The total annual operating costs and expenses amount to $1.1 billion.
Specifically, they include:
· Revenue Cost (excluding depreciation): $543.3 million
· Revenue Cost (depreciation): $116.6 million
· Operating Expenses: $28.9 million (including related-party expenses of $1.1 million)
· Miner Impairment Loss: $338.3 million
· Bitcoin Collateral Receivable Fair Value Change Loss: $96.5 million
The full-year operating loss is $437.1 million. The continuing operations net loss is $452.8 million, while in 2024, there was a net profit of $4.8 million.
The 2025 non-GAAP adjusted net profit is $24.5 million (compared to $5.7 million in 2024). This measure does not include share-based compensation expenses; refer to "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for details.
As of December 31, 2025, the company's key assets and liabilities are as follows:
· Cash and Cash Equivalents: $41.2 million
· Bitcoin Collateral Receivable (Non-current, related party): $663.0 million
· Miner Net Value: $248.7 million
· Long-Term Debt (related party): $557.6 million
In February 2026, the company sold 4,451 bitcoins and repaid a portion of related-party long-term debt to reduce financial leverage and optimize the asset-liability structure.
As per the stock repurchase plan disclosed on March 13, 2025, as of December 31, 2025, the company had repurchased a total of 890,155 shares of Class A common stock for approximately $1.2 million.

The US AI Startup Is Loving China's Open Source Model

